Category: Science

  • Wicked Awesome LHC Pictures

    Follow the link to see some wicked awesome pictures of the Large Hadron Collider.

    They’re “Wicked Awesome” because the pictures are from the Boston Globe.

    At least I didn’t use “Wicked Pissa!”

    Update: Best comment on the comment stream: “pfft this thing again? i have one in my backyard.”

  • Another Myth Comes Tumbling Down

    Apparently the quote commonly attributed to Wolfgang Pauli, “This isn’t right; it’s not even wrong!” might not have been said by the man. It’s possible that it grew in the telling.

    It’s such a great quote, though, no matter who crafted it.

  • Anti-Plush

    Physics is Phun points us toward a website that sells plush toys that represent the various subatomic particles, both actual and theoretical.

    I point out that they missed something that comes straight from the science fiction canon.

    I’m daring to assume here that not everyone already reading my blog is reading Jim’s.

  • We're All Hypocrites

    I read a science article in the NY Times yesterday about how we have the innate ability to justify our choices, internally, despite an objective evaluation that what we did was immoral in a general sense.

    It seems that when presented with the choice between an easy task or a hard task, knowing that another person would be along later to complete the task you didn’t select, most people choose the easy task and convince themselves that this is the fair choice, even though uninterested observers all agree that it is not. It continues by then arbitrarily placing people into two groups and then having one member of each group go through the experiment, picking the easy task. The people in each group agreed that when a member of the other group picked the easy task, it wasn’t fair, yet when one of the members of their own group picked easy, it was.

    Humans are fun, those waskly cweatures.

    This got me thinking about choices I’ve made. Without getting into too much detail, I’ll state that I’m generally a considerate person, but consideration can have a sharp delineation under the type of situation described by the experiment. I’m not sure I agree with the general assessment of the experimental subjects that the first person picking the easy task isn’t “fair”. I could argue (in fact I will argue) that when presented with a binary set of options, with no way to “fairly” distribute them, an inequitable distribution in favor of the first person is “fair” by the standards of our society. We Americans hold closely to a first-come-first-served ethic and with that in mind, it would be perfectly all right for the first person to claim the fruits of being early. Let’s frame it another way. Two people are going to the beach for a picnic. They are both seashell collectors. The first person finds a beautiful conch shell. Should that person leave it for the second person? I don’t believe that is a rational choice in the context of American society.

    Let’s go back to the experiment for a moment. With the seashell analogy, I was describing a situation where the first person has a positive incentive for being first and picking the greater reward. In the experiment, the first person has a less-negative incentive to choose the easy task: either they will work for a short time or a long time. When I was a Boy Scout, in the Order of the Arrow, one of the ethics they teach is to not put down your burden until someone comes to take it from you (yes, I know, very Christian). From that standpoint, by arriving first, you are obligated to choose the more difficult task, to spare your fellow human the difficulty of completing it. This has a reward system built in, but only internally, especially if no one observes you during your moment of self-sacrifice. How many of us are so internally content that we can move through life knowing that we are just king shit, but no one around us is aware of that, or why? Again, to bring up our good ‘ol American cultural upbringing (and maybe I should state that this is White Suburban America) where we aren’t at all very Zen, there’s little incentive to opt for the hard task, under the situation where no one will be aware of your choice. Which brings me back to my wondering why the selection of the easy task was so overwhelmingly considered “unfair”.

    Of course, I’m analyzing a psychological study that I’ve only heard about through a newspaper article. I can’t count the number of times I’ve read a science article in a newspaper and wailed with disbelief over how the writer could screw up the facts on something so easy, and this article may be no exception. I’m not a psychologist and don’t have any basis to judge the merits of the experiment. But I am a person who is presented with choices like this on a daily basis. Do we go with the easy route, knowing that the other person will never know? Or do we throw out a little sacrifice to help out our fellows, also knowing that the other person will never know?

    I’ll leave the answer to that question as an exercise for the reader.

  • Are MMORPGs Addictive?

    MMORPG ScreenshotCognitive Daily shows the results from a limited study of how several computer games affect college students. Are MMORPGs the new reefer? Perhaps.

    I do not play WOW or Age of Conan or any of the other MMORPGs. I’ve refused because I’ve seen since the inception of Ultima and EverQuest just how much valuable time can be sucked down by the need to play the game. Not that I’m throwing stones, here. I’ve been a Tetris freak in my time and I’ve been known to stay up ’til the wee hours for just one more turn on Civilization. I know my limitations and I’m pretty sure that WOW would be the end of my free time.

  • Poison Ivy

    Today’s Xkcd hits a bit close to home for me.

    Xkcd for June 6/30/08

    One of my fun surprises when I moved to Atlanta was just how big poison ivy can grow around here. A tip: if you’re hiking in Georgia, don’t lean against the four-inch-thick hairy vine that’s growing up the side of a tree. For that matter, don’t lean against the hairy vine no matter how thick. Where I lived in New Hampshire, poison ivy was always a ground plant, growing in small clumps or bushes, so I got me an edumacation the first time I had to go to the doctor for a steroid shot.

    Now I hear that increased CO2 concentrations can lead to explosive growth of our hairy-stemmed poisonous friend. Anecdotally, I can attest that I have a ton of poison ivy growing in my yard this year. It wasn’t there previously; this is new growth going to town with a vengeance. We’ve been forced to bring out the nuclear weapons (Roundup™).

    So, watch out hiking in Georgia; if you’re working with the Georgia Appalachian Trail Club, always always always wear long pants.

  • New Walking Robot

    Cornell has pushed the envelope when it comes to designing machines to efficiently move themselves around. A walking robot, intended to show walking energy-efficiency rather than self-reliance, has walked 5.6 miles on one battery charge, which from the size of the robot seems impressive.

    Check out the link for the news release.

  • Blog Withdrawal -or- LOLCATS are eating my Soul

    I’ve spent the last 6 weeks to two months ignoring the blogosphere, even my own tiny segment of it. This has consequences. For one thing, those persons who are used to having me drop my tidbits of wisdom on their comment streams are being denied my presence. For another, I’m entirely out of date on what’s been going on in the science/technology arena since January.

    This withdrawal has benefits, however. I’m not subjected to the soul-eating items that are LOLCATS on a daily basis. There are exceptions to my LOLCATS avoidance, though.

    I saw this doing a sweep of some of the blogs I read. Apparently, I’ve been missing the latest edition of “The Large Hadron Collider will devour the planet.” Check it out.

    Hopefully, I’ll be able to stay a bit more on top of things.

  • Evolution in 10 minutes

    Gacked from the Bad Astronomer’s blog.

    Oftentimes, you have to already have a degree in biology to refute the weird assertions people make about evolution. That speciation hasn’t been observed is one I always have a problem with because, ahem, I’m not a biologist and I don’t keep the details at the front of my brain. All I can say is, “Yes, speciation has been observed in nature and in experiment, but I’ll have to go look up where.” This is usually automatically poo-poohed because I didn’t know right then what the facts were. Alas.

    But this is a great video. Very educational.

  • Chemistry et Oscillation

    Jim Cronen, of Jamescronen.com, twittered about this youtube video. It’s wicked. Make sure you go to his site if you have comments.

    Edit: 2204. Right after I posted this, my little quote engine in the sidebar came up with

    Charlie was a Chemist
    But Charlie is no more
    What Charlie thought was H20
    Was H2SO4