Category: Politics

  • Paris Rebutts

    Thanks to Mike for pointing out this video to me. Although I’m sure I’ll see it on the Daily Show soon.

    Paris Hilton rebutts the McCain campaign advertisement.

  • What the Hell do I know?

    The Mortgage Crisis™ and the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Bailout™ and their confluential conflagration are a great example of policy being set by politics, ideology and the media.

    Why?

    Because not 1% (and I bet less) of the people who are involved have a single clue about the pros and cons of a government bailout. All the congresscritters are voting ideologically and/or to curry favor with the voters. Does anyone know that this will work? No. There have been good examples both for and against government bailouts (socialism!).

    A bad example often cited is the airline subsidy after 9-11. “Look what’s happening to the airline industry now!” The detractors have a point: should we have left the airlines to sink under their own weight 7 years ago rather than watching them slowly implode (if that’s not an oxymoron) now? Or was giving them our hard-earned tax money a way to let them try (somtimes fail) to make operational changes over time that lead to a stable industry? There’s no real way to tell. Economists legitamately do not agree and if the experts can’t agree, what should us no-good layabouts think?

    Of course, this isn’t about economics, it’s about politics and who is successful at pointing the finger at whom. I look forward to seeing how it all falls out, even though (maybe especially because) it’s my tax money.

  • Whiny Brats

    Now hear this! Everyone who was a died-in-the-wool, rabid, gung-ho, balls-to-the-wall Hillary Clinton Supporter! If you do not vote for Barack Obama in November, you are directed to turn in your brain because you will no longer be needing it.

    I keep hearing news stories of Clinton supporters who are vowing to stay home or vote for McCain rather than cast a ballot in favor of Obama. This may be a case of the media latching on to something (anything) they feel is news-worthy, but I can’t help but judge those people as extremely stupid.

    Really! You (that’s Democrats and liberal-thinkers) have been chomping at the bit for 6 years now. You’ve managed to steal Congress (and then you’ve lamented over the crazy way that Pelosi and Reid have together done zip) and you’re looking forward to a Democratically controlled White House who will most likely nominate three Supreme Court Justices. But now that your candidate didn’t do as well as the other one you’re going to pack up your ball and go home to pout? That’s not cutting off your nose to spite your face, that’s pissing on everyone’s shoes and then complaining that your feet are wet.

    The differences between Clinton and Obama are a matter of tone and preference. The differences between McCain and Obama compare favorably to the differences between rocks and sperm: there’s no real comparison.

    So, take your ball and go home. Don’t vote on election day. Don’t participate in the get-out-the-vote campaign that Obama does so well. You’ll be the most derided voters in recent history; more despised as a group then the entire State of Florida was in 2000. You’ll make history and isn’t that what you want?

  • "Geopolitical"

    “The Chairstone recognizes the distinguished Schist from E-stone-ia”

    I was listening to NPR on the way to work this morning and realized that I had no idea what the term “geopolitical” really meant. You hear it all the time in discussions of world events and foreign policy. After checking the definition (“The study of the relationship among politics and geography, demography, and economics, especially with respect to the foreign policy of a nation”) I don’t think it’s used in the correct context most of the time. This morning’s story would probably have been better off using “political” rather than “geopolitical” to describe some of the ramifications of Obama’s visit to Germany, but I’m (obviously) not an expert.

    As the first sentence of this post shows, I started to think about the confluence of Geo (earth) and Politics. I was going to take the punning a bit further, but then I’d have sounded like an episode of The Flintstones, and that’s just not me.

  • Sean Tevis for Kansas State Rep

    I was alerted to Sean Tevis’ state representative race in Kansas through BoingBoing.

    At the risk of sounding shallow, his website is so cool I sent him $10.

    Of course, he’s also running under a platform I would support, so that helps.

  • Blogging the Election

    With only four and a half months left to go in this interminable election cycle things have become quite amusing for those of us who don’t listen to the news on TV and get most of our updates from the web.

    I present, for your entertainment, Why You Should Vote for Barack Obama:

    Barack Obama’s skin is the color of AMERICAN SOIL. His blood is the color of the AMERICAN FLAG. His fingernails are the color of APPLE PIE. He rubs AMERICAN SOIL on his chest every 20 minutes, then cleanses himself with HOLY WATER.

    Truly, Senator Obama is a most American of Americans.

  • Political Action Spam

    I’ve been spammed by a political contribution aggregator named ActBlue1.

    Hello Fundraiser!

    Thanks again for creating a fundraising page to support Barack Obama.

    Now that you’ve spread the word and hopefully have contributions rolling in, we’d like to show you how to track your progress.

    As a page creator, you can see who has contributed to your page and download all the data to an Excel or Access file to keep the information organized.

    Apparently, they accept donations in the name of candidates and then send those donations to said candidates. This lets the political beasts outsource any dealings with credit cards for donations. What’s funny is that I’ve never heard of this organization before and I certainly didn’t set up a fundraising page for Barack Obama. If I want to organize money for Senator Obama, I’ll just send him a check.

    I’m curious how I wound up on their rolls.

    I’ve already hit them with the unsubscribe whammy. Hopefully, they’ll stop bugging me.


    1Spammers don’t get linked in my blog

  • Wikileaks

    I do hereby officially chastise all of my more-vocally-activist friends for not alerting me to this site: Wikileaks. Or, I suppose it’s possible that they didn’t know about it either, in which case I chastise them for not having known about it before now.

    Wikileaks is developing an uncensorable Wikipedia for untraceable mass document leaking and analysis. Our primary interest is in exposing oppressive regimes in Asia, the former Soviet bloc, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, but we also expect to be of assistance to people of all regions who wish to reveal unethical behavior in their governments and corporations. We aim for maximum political impact.

    There’s all sorts of very interesting documents inside this website. Have a look.

  • Tax Day, 2008

    Today is TurboTax’s day of reckoning. Will they burst their servers’ seams like last year or will they weather the storm? We shall see.

    That is my introduction the day’s topic of discussion: Taxes. As an American who proudly states that I live in one of the best countries in the world1, I really don’t have a problem with my tax load. According to my handy dandy calculations, our married-filing-jointly tax rate is surprisingly low. That is because we are doing some of the things that the tax code encourages us to do: be homeowners, donate to charity, etc. As soon as we have kids, or start contributing to IRA’s, or losing money on our farm, we’ll do even better!

    Unfortunately, it’s an election season, and moreover it’s looking like there will be a changing of the guard from Spend More than our Income Republicans to Spend More than our Income, but Raise Taxes a Bit to Make The Deficit Less Democrats. It doesn’t seem that fiscal responsibility is a big ticket item this election cycle despite it is arguably the most important long-term agenda item. Part of that is the difficulty in presenting an effective plan to the public that won’t immediately result in a pitchforks and torches party. I’m a realist enough to admit that people don’t want to make the sacrifices necessary to adopt healthy fiscal policies. That doesn’t change the fact that we’re rapidly chasing the rabbit down the hole and soon we’ll be in crazy land where someone can say “it’s only a 200 billion dollar deficit” and everyone nods like that’s a good thing.

    The process might be painful, but I see some low hanging fruit.2

    • 1) Get the hell out of Iraq. Whether you agree or disagree about the policies that got us there/keep us there, you have to agree that the war is costing a ton of money. That is money that shouldn’t be spent at all. The argument that it’s money that should be spent at home is a false dichotomy. This is money we’re borrowing and paying interest on.
    • 1a) Re-think the size of our armed forces. Armies and Navies are expensive. Do we really need to have one the size we do now? Military expenditures are the second highest item after social services. This is ultimately a policy decision, whether we want to maintain a force that can kick-ass any three places in the world. Personally, I think we have the premier fighting forces in the world, however the American philosophy of armed conflict is OVERWHELMING FIREPOWER until we win, then leave. We need to remember that last part: leave. I won’t stake too hard a position on this item, but it remains a huge portion of our national budget.
    • 2) Implement the FairTax provisions. BAM! You just freed up overhead expenditures that are being used by the IRS to monitor, interpret and enforce the tax code. Those expenditures, not no longer going into a sinkhole can be applied elsewhere in the federal budget.
    • 3) Do an across-the-board 10% budget cut. Or, show no budget increases for the next three years. That will equate to a 10% cut when inflation is accounted for.
    • 4) Remove the ability for Congress to include earmark riders in federal legislation. Okay, this one isn’t a low-hanging fruit, but it’s necessary to display some fiscal restraint.
    • 4a) Give the President the line-item veto ability when it comes to budget authorizations. That way, congress critters can tell their constituents that it wasn’t their fault that the pork subsidies weren’t increased. It was el Presidente!

    The problem, of course, resides with the politicians. Despite campaign rhetoric, republicans have never been any more interested in small government than democrats. Even President Reagan only chose to exercise fiscal cutbacks in the arena of health and welfare. Ask the USSR about how much Reagan cut the military. The truth is that the demand for restraint is only going to work if the people get behind and push and I’m too much of a cynic to see that happening.

    I invite anyone who’s answer to these proposals is “it’s just not that simple” to explain to me why it can’t be that simple.

    Update: After I finished writing this, I saw a news item about McCain’s Tax Day speech. He’s proposing that congress “help spread relief across the American economy” by declaring a Federal gas & diesel tax holiday between Memorial Day and Labor Day. The Federal fuel taxes are 18.4 cents per gallon of gas and 24.4 cents per gallon of diesel. By my calculations, that will save me and Jenn about $59 this summer. I think I’ll let the Feds keep it, especially because that $59 directly funds my job. I can see where a gas tax relief would help people who are more dependent on vehicles, such as truckers, but this is just pissing in the wind. Three months of no fuel taxes will mean three months of no receipts into the Federal Transportation Infrastructure Fund, which will spell worse funding issues later, meaning the need to raise taxes. How does this help?

    1 that title is debatable, and I don’t necessarily disagree with those people who state that we are not the best country presently
    2 while reading this, please keep in mind that my salary is directly affected by government spending. I’m a traffic engineer working for states and counties, so it’s not like I’m divorced from this topic

  • Barak vs. Hillary

    I confess that I was looking at the Texas primary from an extremely shallow point of view. My thought was, “Which would Texas Dems want least in the White House? A Black, or a Woman?” I figured that they would prefer a black man over a woman of any stripe, but obviously I was wrong.

    Or maybe, they actually looked at the issues and picked the candidate they thought would represent them best.

    Nah. That’s way too democratic.